Legal Opinion
Rasmussen v. Sauer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 20, 1999No. C0-98-2365PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge
Gordon Rasmussen and his wife, Julie Rasmussen, appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion to amend their complaint to include an underinsured motorist (UIM) claim against respondent Freeborn County. The district court concluded that because Freeborn County is self-insured as part of the Minnesota Counties Insurance Trust (the MCIT), the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the Rasmussens’ UIM claim, and the Rasmussens were required to exhaust administrative remedies provided by the MCIT bylaws. We reverse and remand to allow the Rasmussens to amend…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Willis v. County of SherburneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Loven v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- County of Martin v. Minnesota Counties Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Colorado School Districts Self Insurance Pool v. J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Colorado School Districts Self Insurance Pool v. J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000