Legal Opinion

Hopper v. Garner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 12, 1997No. 96-1423PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

This appeal involves a dispute over who is the rightful city attorney of Horseshoe Bend. The appellant, Paul Hopper, filed a usurpation-oGoffice action against the appellee, Tom Garner. The jury rendered a verdict for Garner, and Hopper appeals. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

In 1994, Paul Hopper was elected city attorney of Horseshoe Bend, Arkansas. During litigation concerning another matter, Hopper discovered that two people had trespassed on his property. Hopper asked the prosecuting attorney to file a criminal trespass action against these…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Wheat v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  4. Yocum v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Cox v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Craven v. Fulton Sanitation Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. FARM BUREAU POLICY HOLDERS v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Anglin v. Johnson Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Home Mutual Fire Insurance v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API