Legal Opinion

Phillips v. . Giles

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 24, 1918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action, instituted apparently in 1917, was to recover the sum of $283.95, for money loaned by plaintiffs to defendant's intestate.

There was allegation with evidence on part of plaintiff tending to show that, in the years 1905-1908, and 1910, plaintiff loaned to intestate, who was her mother, different sums aggregating the amount in question, and in the fall of 1916, not long before intestate's death, she executed a paper-writing, acknowledging said indebtedness in terms as follows:

"Sept. 18, 1916: This is to certify that I, Mary J. Richmond, owe my daughter, Bettie M. Phillips, $283.95…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Irvin v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. McGowan v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Faison v. . Bowden, Ex'r.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  5. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Tar River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGowan v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Tar River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Smith v. . GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. East Coast Fertilizer Co. v. HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. East Coast Fertilizer Co. v. HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API