State v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
It appeared that, at a former term of the court, the judge having ordered a bill of particulars, the same were furnished at April Term, 1907, as follows:
"The State files a bill of particulars herein as follows:
"1. The train was running north.
"2. The day on which the same was run was a Sunday between the 1st of May and the latter part of July, the exact date the State is unable to state."
The Solicitor stated that the above bill of particulars was all that he was able to furnish, and the same was accepted by the court as full compliance with the order of the court.
After this was done, to wit,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Park v. . ExumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- State v. . BarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- State v. . SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. . EverhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Park v. . ExumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. . WadfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State v. . CraftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Brooks v. Orange Rice Mill Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.