Legal Opinion · Concurrence

East Coast Fertilizer Co. v. Hardee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1ConcurrenceClarkson, J.

This is an action to recover the balance due on an accounting for commercial fertilizers which were delivered by plaintiff to the defendant, as its agent, under and pursuant to the terms and provisions of a contract in writing which was entered into by and between plaintiff and defendant prior to the delivery of said fertilizers.

The action was begun in the Superior Court of New Hanover County on 27 September, 1934.

It is alleged in the complaint that during the year 1934 the plaintiff delivered to the defendant, as is agent, under and pursuant to the terms and provisions of a contract in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Gossler v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Doyle v. . BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Forsyth v. Zebulon Cotton Oil Mill Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haines v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API