Smith v. . Gordon
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.
The two determinative questions of law presented by the record are:
1. What is the effect of the distress judgment rendered in West Virginia in September, 1926?
2. Do the letters written by the defendant prevent the bar of the statute of limitations?
The West Virginia judgment, upon its face, is a proceeding in rem in the nature of an attachment and was obtained without personal service upon the defendant. Such a judgment “is conclusive evidence that the debt sued on was due to the plaintiff in it, to the value of the property attached, but of nothing more.” Peebles v. Patapsco Guano Co., 77 N.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tieffenbrun v. . FlannerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Tieffenbrun v. FlannerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Peebles v. Patapsco Guano Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Warlick v. H. P. Reynolds & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Irvin v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nowell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- McGowan v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Little v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Merchants & Planters National Bank of Sherman v. AppleyardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.