Smith v. . Hauser and Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
It is provided in section 60 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, chap. 120, Public Laws, 1929, that the award of the Commission “shall be conclusive and binding as to all questions of fact.” Reed v. Lavender Bros., post, 898, 172 S. E., 877; Chambers v. Oil Co., 199 N. C., 28, 153 S. E., 594. Therefore, the facts found by the full Commission are binding on the courts, unless the evidence is insufficient to support the findings. Dependents of Thompson v. Funeral Home, 205 N. C., 801; Dependents of Poole v. Sigman, 202 N. C., 112, 162 S. E., 198.
“It is well settled that if there is any competent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chambers v. . Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Massey v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Kenan v. Duplin Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Dependents of Fred Poole v. SigmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Johnson v. Charlotte Bagging Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rowe v. . Rowe-Coward Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Blevins v. . TeerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Saunders v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935