Legal Opinion
Union Mutual Insurance Co. v. Page
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 2, 1917No. 7038PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error from District Court, Washita County ; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by the Union Mutual Insurance Company against Hattie Page and J. . H. Hays. Judgment for defendant Hays, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBBERTS, C.
This action was brought by the Union Mutual Insurance Company, plaintiff in error, against Hattie Page and J. H. Hays, defendants in error, to recover on a promissory note given by defendants to plaintiff a's premium for hail insurance policy on 60 acres of cotton for the season of 1911. The note is as follows:
“Hail Insurance.
“S76U0 Enid, Okla., March 18, 1911.
“On or before the first day of October of this year, for value received, I, .we, or either of us, promise to pay to The Union Mutual Insurance Company, of Enid, Oklahoma, or order, the sum of sevénty-six and_…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Kennedy v. FaldeSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1886
- Sapington v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
- Driskill v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Cummins v. GarretsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1854
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baker v. Gaines Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Greene County v. City BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Dickason-Goodman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Ricks v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Harn v. Security Nat. Bank of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918