Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Falde

Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota

Decided October 6, 1886PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Lincoln county. The facts appear iu the opinion. Delay does not exonerate a surety. Civil Code Sec. 1668 Oral evidence was competent to explain the circumstances un der which the letters were written. Greenleaf Ev. Sec. 297 Civil Code Sec. 938; Pearson v. Post, 2 Dak. 220. The alleged notice by the surety to the creditor was insufficient.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the district court of Lincoln county. The facts appear iu the opinion. Delay does not exonerate a surety. Civil Code Sec. 1668 Oral evidence was competent to explain the circumstances un der which the letters were written. Greenleaf Ev. Sec. 297 Civil Code Sec. 938; Pearson v. Post, 2 Dak. 220. The alleged notice by the surety to the creditor was insufficient. Wilson v. Tebbetts, 29 Ark. 579; Ranturns v. Lacy, 17 Mo. 299; Dane v. Corduan, 24 Cal. 157, Herrick v. Boost, 4 Hill 657; Hays v. Joseph, 26 Cal. 543: 32 Cal. 577; 34 Cal. 281; 42 Cal. 500; Smith v. Freyler, 1 Pac. 219. The…

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

The plaintiff and appellant instituted this action in the district court to recover the balance due upon two promissory notes bearing date July 7, 1877, — one for $165 and the other for $150. Upon the $165 note interest was payable at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and upon the $150 note interest at 10 per cent, per annum. Upon the $165 note were two indorsements, one for $20 May 5, 1878, and one for $50 December 5, 1879. Upon the $150 note various payments have been made, so that from the plaintiff’s complaint there appeared to be due upon the "'165 note the sum of $157.72, and upon the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  2. Hayes v. KnoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Galloway v. McLeanSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1881
  4. German-American Bank v. DenmireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  5. Dorothy v. HicksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hiestand v. RistauNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  2. James v. HoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Pease v. MagillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Banbury v. SherinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Medlock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API