Legal Opinion

Driskill v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Erom the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

The appellee, as obligee, sued the appellant and one Daniel B. Driskill, as obligors in a penal bond given to secure the payment to appellee, or their agent of the three per cent, fund, of a certain sum of money, at a certain time. Appellant demurred to appellee’s complaint, for a want of sufficient facts. This demurrer was overruled, and appellant excepted. Appellant then answered the complaint in three paragraphs. Appellee demurred separately to the second and third paragraphs of the answer, upon the ground, as to each of said paragraphs, that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Halstead v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vanarsdall v. State ex rel. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Daily v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Sturgeon v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Scales v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Union Mutual Insurance Co. v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API