Legal Opinion
In Re Appeal of Consolidated School District No. 16
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 7, 1930No. Nos. 27,631, 27,632PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
Two appeals from orders denying motions for new trials. The orders also deny certain amendments to findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The county board of Blue Earth county granted two petitions of landowners to- detach their lands, aggregating 480 acres, from consolidated school district No. 16 and to attach said lands to independent school district No. 19, all in said county. The two districts will be referred to as district 16 and district 19. Appeals were taken to the district court and the two appeals tried together. The court submitted to the jury in each appeal the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farrell v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Common School District No. 85 v. County of RenvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Sorknes v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- School District No. 36 v. School District No. 31Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Hall v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Read v. StephensMontana Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re Petition of Minneapolis Area Development Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Paetzel v. CliftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.