Legal Opinion

Farrell v. County of Sibley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1917No. Nos. 20,093—(221)PublishedCited by 28 opinions

From an order of the board of county commissioners of Sibley county, denying a petition for the enlargement of Independent School District No. 71 of that county, J. C. Farrell, a resident and legal voter of that district, appealed to the district court for that county, on the ground that the action of the board was against the best interests of the territory affected and of the inhabitants thereof.

Read the full summary

From an order of the board of county commissioners of Sibley county, denying a petition for the enlargement of Independent School District No. 71 of that county, J. C. Farrell, a resident and legal voter of that district, appealed to the district court for that county, on the ground that the action of the board was against the best interests of the territory affected and of the inhabitants thereof. The appeal was heard before Morrison, J., who made findings and ordered judgment reversing the order of the county board' and attaching to the school district the territory described in paragraph 3…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Proceedings by petition of freeholders under section 2677, G. S. 1913, for the enlargement of Independent School District No. 71, of Sibley county, by adding thereto certain territory to be detached from adjoining common school districts. The petition was duly presented to the board of county commissioners as required by the statute, together with a remonstrance against the proposed change, and after due consideration of the matter and of the evidence tendered in support of and in opposition to the same, the prayer thereof was denied and the proceeding dismissed. An appeal was taken to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Luley v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Schweigert v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Hunstiger v. KilianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Sorknes v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. School District No. 36 v. School District No. 31Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dybdal v. State Securities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Brazil v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. G. O. Miller Telephone Co. v. Minimum Wage CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API