Legal Opinion
Paetzel v. Clift
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 1951No. 35,400, 35,401PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Christianson, Justice.
This case involves an attempted dissolution of Common School District No. 188, hereinafter referred to as Westview, and the annexation of the territory of that district to Independent School District No. 89, hereinafter referred to as Meadowbrook. Both of these districts are located in Golden Valley, a suburb lying directly west of the city limits of Minneapolis. Defendant is the treasurer of Westview, and plaintiffs, Henry O. Paetzel and C. H. Hartupee, are the respective chairmen of Westview and Meadowbrook districts. Appeal is taken from each of two judgments…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v. SandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Common School District No. 85 v. County of RenvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Hall v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Severts v. County of Yellow MedicineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Independent School Distbict No. 36 v. Independent School Distbict No. 68Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Dissolution of School District No. 33Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. MorrisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- G.E.M. of St. Louis, Inc. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Paetzel v. CliftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951