Brouse v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, Circuit Judge.
The defendant was convicted of using the mails in a scheme to defraud. The important questions on the present appeal relate to the statute of limitations. There were four counts in the indictment, based on as many different letters. The letters were alleged to have been mailed on January 23, 1929, August 2, 1929, October 8, 1929, and October 19, 1929. All of them were sent to the complaining witness in Boston from points outside the state and district of Massachusetts. It will be noticed that the latest date on which a crime is, by the indictment, charged to have been…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- South Carolina v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Greene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Jose D. FlorezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Elijah Ephraim Jhirad v. Thomas E. Ferrandina, United States Marshal, Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Stephen GonsalvesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Elijah Ephraim Jhirad v. Thomas E. Ferrandina, United States Marshal, Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- George Finbar Ross v. United States Marshal for the Eastern District of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.