Legal Opinion

In re Diehl

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1988No. 62,094PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,-.

This is an original action in discipline initiated by Bruce Miller, disciplinary administrator, against Robert E. Diehl, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas, alleging respondent had violated Canon 1 of the Code of Professional Responsibility by Failing to Maintain the Integrity of the Legal Profession (Rule 225,1987 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 122). A panel of the Board for Discipline of Attorneys conducted a hearing upon the allegations of the complaint and on March 23, 1988, filed a final hearing report in which two members recommended public censure, finding that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. In re HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. In re TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In re DirectorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. In re WolfsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re RobertsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. In Re PistotnikSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. In re ConwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re KraushaarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API