In re Diehl
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,-.
This is an original action in discipline initiated by Bruce Miller, disciplinary administrator, against Robert E. Diehl, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas, alleging respondent had violated Canon 1 of the Code of Professional Responsibility by Failing to Maintain the Integrity of the Legal Profession (Rule 225,1987 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 122). A panel of the Board for Discipline of Attorneys conducted a hearing upon the allegations of the complaint and on March 23, 1988, filed a final hearing report in which two members recommended public censure, finding that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- In re HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- In re DirectorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re WolfsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re RobertsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- In Re PistotnikSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- In re ConwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re KraushaarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.