Legal Opinion

In re Turner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1984No. 584S165PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This proceeding is now before the Court, pursuant to Ind. R.A.D. 23, Section 11(a), on a Conditional Agreement tendered by the parties. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Respondent, Patrick J. Turner, is charged with violating Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), (8) and (6) of the Code of Professional Responsibility for Attorney at Law. As required, the Respondent has also submitted his affidavit in accordance with the provisions of Ind.R.A.D. 23, Section 17(a). f

Upon examination of the tendered agreement, this Court now finds that it should be approved and, accordingly, adopts, as the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re DiehlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. In re DohertySupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  3. In THE MATTER OF McNEILIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API