Legal Opinion

In re Conwell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 2001No. 86,308PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the Disciplinary Administrator s office against Gary L. Conwell, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas.

A formal complaint was filed against respondent, alleging violations of Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4 (2000 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 420) (misconduct).

A formal hearing was held before a panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys on November 15, 2000. Respondent appeared in person and by Steven D. Rosel. The Disciplinary Administrator, Stanton A. Hazlett, appeared for petitioner. The respondent stipulated to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re SmootSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. In re DiehlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re ConwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API