Legal Opinion
In Re Pistotnik
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided December 10, 1993No. 69,393PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ter Curiam:
This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the Office of the Disciplinary Administrator against Bradley A. Pistotnik, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas. Two formal disciplinary complaints, case No. B5344 and case No. B5357, were brought against Pistotnik based on a pattern of repeated criminal offenses and on his conduct in connection with a personal injury action. A hearing panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys (Board) found that Pistotnik violated MRPC 8.4(b), (d), and (g) (1993 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 347) (misconduct) in connection with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- State v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. PattersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- State v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. KlassenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- In Re KetterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- In Re JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- In re PistotnikSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.