Legal Opinion
Graham and Ross Mercantile Co. v. Sprout, Waldron & Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided June 4, 1959No. Civ. 2013PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
This is a diversity case removed from state court. Plaintiff is a Montana corporation and defendant a Pennsylvania corporation. The defendant has filed a motion to quash service of summons. Able and exhaustive briefs have been filed by both parties.
Service was made on defendant by delivering to the Secretary of State a copy of the summons and complaint pursuant to R.C.M.1947, § 93-3008, as amended by c. 122, L. 1951, which permits such service on a “corporation organized under the laws of any other state or country that is actually doing business within the state of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boit v. Emmco InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1967
- Hartung v. Washington Iron WorksDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1964
- Greene Plumbing & Heating Co. v. MorrisMontana Supreme Court · 1964
- Minnehoma Financial Company v. Van OostenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1961