Legal Opinion
Hartung v. Washington Iron Works
District Court, D. Montana
Decided November 25, 1964No. Civ. 477, 476PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMESON, Chief Judge.
Defendant has filed a motion in each of these cases to dismiss on the grounds of (1) lack of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, and (2) insufficiency of process. Affidavits and briefs were filed on behalf of the respective parties, and a hearing was held pursuant to the provisions of Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The motions involve the construction of Rule 4B(1) of the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure, which reads in pertinent part:
“Subject to Jurisdiction. All persons found within the State of Montana are subject to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- McMahon v. Boeing Airplane CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1961
- Feathers v. McLucasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bi-Lo Foods, Inc. v. Alpine Bank, CliftonMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Continental Oil Company v. Atwood & Morrill CompanyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1967
- Nacci v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1972
- Boit v. Emmco InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1967
- Colstrip Energy LP v. JBED Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2019