Legal Opinion

Minnehoma Financial Company v. Van Oosten

District Court, D. Montana

Decided September 29, 1961No. Civ. 305PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMESON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at Tulsa, Oklahoma, brought this action against defendant, a Montana corporation, to recover on guaranties of conditional sales contracts assigned to plaintiff by defendant and trust receipts executed by defendant. Plaintiff has not qualified to do business in Montana under the provisions of Sections 15-1701 to 15-1713, R.C.M.1947, 1 relating to foreign corporations doing business in the State of Montana. The sole question presented is whether, by reason of plaintiff’s failure to comply with these…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. Arkansas Ex Rel. Ashley Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. General Fire Extinguisher Co. v. Northwestern Auto Supply Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Dover Lumber Co. v. WhitcombMontana Supreme Court · 1917

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hartung v. Washington Iron WorksDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1964
  2. Greene Plumbing & Heating Co. v. MorrisMontana Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API