Legal Opinion

Estate of Fields

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1949No. Civ. 17281PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal from an order of partial distribution. The will of W. C. Fields bequeathed $5,000 each to his sister and brother. They petitioned for distribution of the *235legacies. The widow of Fields appeals from the order distributing the legacies to them.

The verified petition for partial distribution alleged these facts: All claims against the estate have been paid except a contingent claim of the widow in the amount of $241,000. (See Fields v. Michael, 91 Cal.App.2d 443 [205 P.2d 402].) The inventory and appraisement shows the value of the estate to be about $800,000. After the payment of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Fields v. MichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. In re Estate of PainterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Costello v. BowenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Estate of HinkelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BreardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Estate of TolerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Estate of DowningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Estate of MorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Cables v. BeardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API