Legal Opinion

Estate of Hinkel

California Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1917No. S. F. No. 8317PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from decrees of partial distribution of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Jas. M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Elizabeth Hinkel, as executrix of the last will of William Hinkel, deceased, appeals from two decrees of partial distribution made in favor of John Hinkel and Edgar W. Hinkel, respectively.

On November 4, 1914, William Hinkel’s will was admitted to probate, and Elizabeth Hinkel and Oliver L. Jones were appointed executrix and executor. The will bequeathed to each of seven nephews and nieces, children of the decedent’s brother Charles, three thousand dollars; to a niece and nephew, children of a sister, three thousand dollars each; to the widow, Elizabeth Plinkel (who prosecutes this appeal as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ColtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. In Re Estate of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. In re Estate of CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. In re PritchettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Estate of MoleraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Estate of FieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Estate of MorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. In Re Estate of HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API