Legal Opinion

Ward v. Bullis

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2008No. 20070188PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ronald Ward, Ron Stensgard, and Duane Dumas (“plaintiffs”) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their lawsuit against James Bullís for state securities law violations and fraud claims. The plaintiffs claim they suffered damages as a result of misrepresentations in connection with the sale of securities. We reverse the dismissal of the plaintiffs’ Securities Act claims because we conclude there is a genuine issue of material fact about whether Bullís is an agent and is liable for violations of the Securities Act, but affirm the dismissal of plaintiffs’ common law…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hurt v. FreelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Adams v. Little Missouri Minerals AssociationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Baker, Watts & Co. v. Miles & StockbridgeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Olson v. IscheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tibert v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bice v. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. San Francisco Residence Club, Inc. v. Baswell-GuthrieDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
  4. Paul Bennett v. Hunter DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. State v. MakiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API