Wall v. . Howard
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBROgdeN, J.
Tbe cause of action alleged by tbe plaintiffs is thus stated in tbe fifth paragraph of tbe complaint: “Tbat at tbe time of receiving tbe said deposit above referred to by the said bank, the defendants in this cause knew that the said bank was insolvent or was being handled in such a reckless mánner and disregardful of the trust imposed in them, the law, safe banking, and good business, that it must become insolvent as a result thereof, as is hereinafter fully set forth, making the defendants personally liable to these plaintiffs by reason of the said acts and failure to perform and do their…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Corp. Commission v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Douglass v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. HightowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Bane v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
3Cited by9 opinions
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. PeirceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Lipe v. Guilford National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Ham v. NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Merchants Bank v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Roscower v. . BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.