Roscower v. . Bizzell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOB, J.
The principle is well settled that “directors and managing officers of a corporation are deemed by the law to be trustees or quasi-trustees, in respect to the performance of their official duties incident to corporate management, and are therefore liable for either wilful or negligent failure to perform their official duties. Therefore, if there is a loss of the corporation’s assets, caused and brought about by the negligent failure of its officers to perform their duties, the corporation, or its receiver, in case of insolvency, can maintain an action therefor.” This principle has been…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McIver v. Young Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Besseliew v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Douglass v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Coble v. Beall.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Corp. Commission v. Harnett County Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tuttle v. Junior Building Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Jordan v. HartnessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Word v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
- Sain v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Merrimon v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.