Legal Opinion

Bane v. . Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 27, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

The facts material for the decision of the question presented by this appeal, as alleged in the complaint, and admitted by the demurrer, upon the ground that they do not constitute a cause of action, in favor of plaintiff and against defendants, are as follows :

1. On 20 January, 1926, defendants were officers and directors of the Rank of Columbus, a corporation organized and doing business under the banking laws of the State of North Carolina; plaintiff on said date deposited in said bank the sum of $6,255.00.

2. On the date of said deposit, and for a long time prior thereto, during which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Solomon v. . BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Townsend v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Houston v. . ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Douglass v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Tate v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. PeirceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Corp. Commission v. Merchants BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Ford Motor Credit Company v. L. Dean MingesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. Minnis v. . SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Jordan v. HartnessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API