Legal Opinion
Landon v. Kroll Laboratory Specialists, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 2013PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Lippman.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether plaintiff Eric Landon has stated a cause of action against defendant drug testing laboratory (Kroll) for the alleged negligent testing of his biological sample. Under the circumstances of this case, we find the complaint sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss.
*4In January 2002, Landon was convicted of second degree forgery and was sentenced to a five-year term of probation. One of the conditions of Landon’s probation was a requirement that he submit to random drug testing. Pursuant to a contract with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- EBC I, Inc. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Lauer v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. v. Vigilant InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Sharpe v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Doctor Fred L. Pasternack v. Laboratory Corporation of America HoldingsNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Pasternack v. Laboratory Corp. of America HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc., Series 2006-FM2 v. Nomura Credit & Capital, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- JF Capital Advisors, LLC v. The Lightstone Group, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- In re Facebook, Inc., IPO Securities & Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.