Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1970No. 191PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The issue on appeal is whether there is credible evidence to support the examiner’s finding that Erickson did not sustain the injury to his back on August 23,1967, as alleged.

If there is credible evidence to support the findings of the department, such findings will not be upset on appeal. R. T. Madden, Inc. v. ILHR Department (1969), 43 Wis. 2d 528, 169 N. W. 2d 73. It is the duty of the department to deny compensation if it finds a legitimate doubt exists regarding the facts necessary to establish a claim.

“ ‘It is an elementary principle of law that the applicant has the burden of proof in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Lewellyn v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Fitz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Beem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Van Valin v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. McFarrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bumpas v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Leist v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bumpas v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
  5. Kowalchuk v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API