Legal Opinion

State v. McFarren

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1974No. 300PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Two legal issues are raised on this appeal:

1. Did the circuit court err in dismissing the petition on the ground that the order lacked a finding of fact on the nonexistence of a bulkhead line ?

2. Did the court err in dismissing the petition on the ground that the criminal transcript had not been made a part of the record ?

Nonexistence op a bulkhead line

What is a bulkhead line?

The legislative council notes to secs. 30.04, 30.11 and 30.12, Wisconsin Statutes Annotated, indicate that “bulkhead line” is the term which replaced “shoreline” in previous statutes to conform to terminology used by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Just v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Diana Shooting Club v. HustingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Doemel v. JantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hixon v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Dittman v. NagelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. ArmstrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. BleckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. WestWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. TrudeauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Sterlingworth Condominium Ass'n v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API