Legal Opinion

Van Valin v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1962PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

The sole question for determination is whether there is any credible evidence to sustain the finding of the Industrial Commission that the appellant, Sylvia Van Valin, did not sustain an injury to her neck and arm in the course of and arising out of her employment.

It is an elementary principle of law that the applicant has the burden of proof in a workmen’s compensation case, and if the evidence before the Industrial Commission is sufficient to raise in the mind of the commission a legitimate doubt as to the existence of facts necessary and essential to establish a claim for compensation, it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Unruh v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Fitz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Johnston v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Molinaro v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Nielsen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Lewellyn v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Braun v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Ace Refrigeration & Heating Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Kraynick v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API