Legal Opinion

Hester Maggett v. Nicholas Norton

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 30, 1975No. 806, Docket 74-2670PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GURFEIN, Circuit Judge:

Appellees filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and its jurisdictional counterpart, 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), asserting that the procedures used by the Connecticut State Welfare Department to redetermine appellees’ eligibility for benefits under the state’s Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program (AFDC) deprived appellees of procedural due process rights guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment. A single district judge conducted a hearing and thereafter held that the Department’s procedures were constitutionally inadequate, ordering appellant Commissioner to correct them.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Susan Roe v. Nicholas NortonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Wilson v. EdelmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. Woe v. MathewsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
  4. Lang v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  5. Joseph Stone, Intervening v. Paul Philbrook, Individually and as Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Social WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API