Legal Opinion

Joseph Stone, Intervening v. Paul Philbrook, Individually and as Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Social Welfare

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 3, 1975No. 75--7066PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal by the Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Social Welfare from an order of the District Court for Vermont granting intervening plaintiff’s motion for class action designation and also for summary judgment to the extent of declaring that Vermont was bound to give a trial-type hearing and to continue payments pending the outcome of the hearing before denying a reapplication of those who had received General Assistance payments three times during a preceding thirty-day period. The appeal raises intriguing questions concerning the scope of Goldberg…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Guadalupe Guajardo, Jr., Cross-Appellants v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Genesco Entertainment, a Div. of Lymutt v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. John Doe v. Robert M. Gates, Director of Central IntelligenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  5. Baden v. KochCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API