Legal Opinion

Sweitzer v. Outlet Communications, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 1999No. 98AP-745PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bowman, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Darrell Sweitzer, filed a complaint in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas against defendants-appellees, Outlet Communications, Inc., d.b.a. WCMH-Channel 4 (“WCMH”), and Richard Skidmore.

The complaint set forth claims for relief based on defamation and conspiracy. The claims stem from a broadcast of a story prepared by Skidmore, an investigative reporter employed by WCMH, about a dispute between appellant, who is a jeweler, and a customer over the sale of a diamond. The common pleas court awarded summary judgment in favor of appellees and dismissed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Helton v. Scioto County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Vail v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Carlo Croce v. New York Times Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Jayne Knox v. Neaton Auto Products Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Morrison v. GugleOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Croce v. N.Y. Times Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
  5. Hartman v. KerchOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API