Legal Opinion
DiPalma v. Phelan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 1992PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
*756Plaintiff commenced this tort action for damages claiming, among other things, that her right to privacy under the Federal Constitution had been violated when, acting under color of law, defendant Phelan, the Town Chief of Police, disclosed the contents of a supporting deposition that she had signed in connection with her allegations that her father, a Town employee, had sexually abused her when she was less than 18 years old (see, 42 USC § 1983). Plaintiff alleged in the present action that she…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Doe v. Borough of BarringtonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Woods v. WhiteDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1988
- Carter v. Broadlawns Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1987
- Carter v. Broadlawns Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1987
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brown v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Schulz v. Cobleskill-Richmondville Central School District Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Weimer v. City of JohnstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Kosmider v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Linen v. County of RensselaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.