Legal Opinion
Kuykendall v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 29, 1987No. 56374PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Vice Chief Justice.
Upon certiorari having been previously granted to the Court of Appeals, petitioners-appellants C.H. and G.H. Kuykendall present for consideration the appeal of a summary judgment in a quiet title action arising in the District Court of Grady County. The appellants alleged in their petition they were the owners of an undivided one-half mineral interest in the NW/4 of Section 7 T8N/R8W in Grady County and that an oil and gas lease held by the defendant-appellee, Helmerich & Payne, Inc., constituted a cloud upon their title. It was alleged this interest was no longer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Exxon Corp. v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- LAWSON v. CITIZEN ENERGY IICourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020