Legal Opinion
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Tomlinson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 20, 1993No. 78350PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATT, Justice:
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma has certified several questions of state law to this Court pursuant to the Oklahoma Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S. 1991 § 1601, et seq.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Before the federal court is an action to determine title to an oil and gas leasehold interest. The mineral interest covered by the disputed lease is an undivided one-half interest in the oil, gas and other minerals in the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 5 North, Range 18 East, Latimer County,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bomford v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Rogers v. Excise Bd. of Greer CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Samson Resources Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Woods Petroleum Corp. v. SledgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Cartwright v. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. BuckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Brumark Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Cowen Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Voiles v. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Canady v. ReynoldsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.