Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 16, 2017No. 15-3254PublishedCited by 1,075 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Seeking to proceed without prepayment of fees, Tracey Coleman brought a pro se suit against the Labor and Industry Review Commission of the State of Wisconsin (Commission). At the same time as he submitted his affidavit of indigence, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), he filed a document indicating that he consented to have a magistrate judge decide the case. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). The magistrate judge dismissed the suit and entered a final judgment before the Commission was even served, and thus before it had any occasion either to consent to or to refuse the option of proceeding…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,075 opinions
- Michael Williams v. Audrey KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Alnoraindus Burton v. Partha GhoshCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Pinkus v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- United States v. Pramela GanjiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Kenall Mfg. Co. v. Cooper Lighting, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
1,070 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.