Legal Opinion

Pinkus v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided July 26, 2018No. 16 C 10858PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge

Binyamin Pinkus alleges that Sirius XM Radio, Inc. violated the Telephone Consumer *929Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C. § 227, by causing over one hundred calls to be placed to his cell phone using an automated telephone dialing system ("ATDS" or "autodialer"), and also by using prerecorded voice messages on those calls. Doc. 105. Sirius brought third-party claims against several telemarketing service providers, Doc. 8, three of which remain in the case, Docs. 73, 103 (voluntarily dismissing two providers); Docs. 81-82 (reported at 255 F.Supp.3d 747…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kendale L. Adams v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Coleman v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. Northern Indiana Gun & Outdoor Shows, Inc. v. City of South Bend, Stephen Leucke, Brian R. Hedman, and Karl KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Zena Phillips v. The Prudential Insurance CompaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Nicole Blow v. Bijora, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ali Gadelhak v. AT&T Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Thompson-Harbach v. USAA Federal Sav. BankDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019
  3. Richardson v. Verde Energy USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Susan Allan v. Penn. Higher Educ. Assistance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. Johnson v. Yahoo!, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API