Adamson v. May Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, J.
Plaintiff seeks reversal of a summary judgment dismissing his action against a department store and its security officer for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. 1 Defendants argue that summary judgment was justified because the security officer’s probable cause to believe plaintiff committed a theft offense had been demonstrated by two prior determinations of probable cause. The municipal court judge had so found when he ordered plaintiff’s bind over for grand jury consideration, and the grand jury so found when it indicted plaintiff for that theft. We conclude that each of those…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boose v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Feliciano v. KreigerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Kennedy v. WalcuttOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Zalewski v. GallagherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. Mount Sinai Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Tuleta v. Med. Mut. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Mayes v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Adamson v. Dayton Hudson Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
- Stanley P. Aronson v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.