Legal Opinion

Stanley P. Aronson v. City of Akron

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 29, 1997No. 95-3184PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

Ohio’s “corrupt activity” law — sometimes called “Ohio RICO,” after the federal statute on which it is patterned 1 — provides that a person convicted of violating Ohio Rev.Code § 2923.32 (a section that makes it a first degree felony to conduct the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of corrupt activity) shall criminally forfeit his interest, if any, in property used in the course of or derived from the illegal conduct. See § 2923.32(B)(3). The law further provides that during the pendency of a criminal proceeding under Ohio RICO, the state, by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. RegisterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Diaz v. PatersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. L. W. v. Jonathan SkrmettiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  5. Roberts v. Total Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API