Legal Opinion
Mayes v. City of Columbus
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 17, 1995No. 94APE09-1316PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Strausbaugh, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Albert Mayes, appeals the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas which granted defendants-appellees’ city of Columbus, Molly Smith and Lorena Schrader’s motion for directed verdict. Appellant sets forth the following three assignments of error:
“I. The trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of Defendants Molly Smith and Lorena Schrader on the claims of malicious prosecution.
“II. The trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of all defendants on the claims arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
“III. The trial court erred in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Tucker v. the Kroger CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Morrison v. Horseshoe CasinoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Reinoehl v. Trinity Universal InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hidey v. Ohio State Highway PatrolOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wingrove v. ForsheyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.