Riddle v. Riddle
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the entry of the permanent injunction restraining him from breaching the provision of the separation agreement requiring him to pay $600 to plaintiff until her death or remarriage. We think the contention has merit.
The parties stipulated that no alimony or support provisions from the separation agreement were incorporated into the judgment dissolving the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant; that the divorce judgment “merely recited that a separation agreement had been entered into by the parties.” We think these stipulations are of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Stanley v. . StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- In Re the Custody of DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Watson v. WatsonNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Sainz v. SainzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Sethness v. SethnessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.