Luttrell ex rel. Butler v. Carolina Mineral Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
Considering the evidence on this appeal in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, and giving to them the benefit of every rea*789sonable inference therefrom, we find no error in the judgment below— the challenge to the correctness of which constitutes in the main the debate on the appeal.
The question: Is there evidence of actionable negligence sufficient to take the case to the jury?
In an action for recovery of damages for injury resulting from actionable negligence the plaintiff must show: (1) That there has been a failure on the part of defendant to exercise proper care in the performance of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Davis v. Siloo Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Barnett v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Crump v. BrowningDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Duvall v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1970
- Moore v. Order Minor ConventualsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.