Legal Opinion

Luttrell ex rel. Butler v. Carolina Mineral Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 23, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

Considering the evidence on this appeal in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, and giving to them the benefit of every rea*789sonable inference therefrom, we find no error in the judgment below— the challenge to the correctness of which constitutes in the main the debate on the appeal.

The question: Is there evidence of actionable negligence sufficient to take the case to the jury?

In an action for recovery of damages for injury resulting from actionable negligence the plaintiff must show: (1) That there has been a failure on the part of defendant to exercise proper care in the performance of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. Siloo Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Barnett v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Crump v. BrowningDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Duvall v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1970
  5. Moore v. Order Minor ConventualsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API