Legal Opinion

Davis v. Siloo Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1980No. 7929SC898PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Since the claims asserted by the plaintiff appellant have different applications to each defendant, we elect to consider the potential liability of each defendant separately. We note that the Products Liability Act, Chapter 99B of the North Carolina General Statutes, effective 1 October 1979, is not applicable to this and other actions pending at the effective date.

I. SILOO INCORPORATED

A. Absolute Liability and Negligence (Manufacturer)

The Appellate Courts of North Carolina have not gone so far as to adopt a general rule of strict liability of manufacturers of products introduced…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Whitley v. CubberlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Wyatt v. North Carolina Equipment CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tetterton v. Long Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Zamora v. Mobil Oil Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Ziglar v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Crews v. W. A. Brown & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Foyle Ex Rel. McMillan v. Lederle LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API