Legal Opinion · Dissent

Corbett v. Plymouth Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1996No. Docket Nos. 97085, 97599, 102521Published

1DissentRiley, J.

I cannot agree with the majority’s interpretation of MCL 418.354; MSA 17.237(354) that (1) an employee’s lump-sum pension payment is coordinated with his weekly worker’s compensation payments by amortizing the lump sum over his life expectancy, and (2) an employer cannot coordinate an employee’s lump-sum payment from a *556pension that he places into an Individual Retirement Account (ira) until the time he would have been obliged to accept payment under his pension or retirement program if he had not cashed out his pension. Although I appreciate the difficulty in applying the language of § 354 to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Salas v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Drouillard v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gardner v. Van Buren Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API