Lucky v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The submission was on motion and on merits. The motion to.strike the bill of exceptions is based on the failure to set out consecutively the interrogatories propounded under the statute and the answers thereto. It is averred that questions of fact are thus obscured. However, the real issues are apparent. The motion is overruled.
The residence in this state of a decedent husband, at the time of his death, is the statutory prerequisite to give the right of himestead to the widow and the minor child or children of such decedent. Talmadge’s Adm’r v. Talmadge, 66 Ala. 199; Curry v. Barnes, 200 Ala.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Merrill's Heirs v. MorrissettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Allgood v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Talmadge's Adm'r v. TalmadgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Chamboredon v. FayetSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Collins v. Mobile O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ex Parte WeissingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Mitchell v. KinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Pope v. HowleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Nora v. NoraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Caheen v. CaheenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.