Mitchell v. Kinney
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The several assignments of error challenge the finding of facts and the judgment rendered thereon. There were several rulings by the trial court, in excluding and admitting evidence against objection by respective parties, that will be considered later.
It will be noted that a material part of the testimony was taken ore tenus before the trial judge. Plis findings and judgment, under the rule that obtains in this jurisdiction, will not be disturbed on appeal unless palpably wrong. Andrews v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152, 74 So. 62; Hodge v. Joy, 207 Ala. 198, 92 So. 171; Pate v. Pate,…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Queen v. HepburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Partido Popular Democrático v. Barreto PérezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1981
- Eubanks v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Hadnott v. AmosDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1970
- Dixie Electric Company v. MaggioSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Alabama Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.