Legal Opinion

Caheen v. Caheen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 7, 1937No. 6 Div. 27PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TPIOMAS, Justice.

This bill is for divorce and alimony, temporary and permanent.

The bill alleged that complainant “is a bona fide resident citizen of Jefferson County * * * and has been for more-than three years next preceding the filing of this bill of complaint,” and that respondent, Julien Sidney Caheen, “is a nonresident of the State of Alabama” and “a resident of the State of Massachusetts.”

Respondent Caheen appeared specially and pleaded to the jurisdiction of the court, saying:

“Respondent avers that at the time the bill of complaint in this cause was filed herein complainant was not a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Wilkerson v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Caldwell v. PollakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Holmes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Merrill's Heirs v. MorrissettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WeissingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Gee v. GeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Hilley v. HilleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Wilkerson v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Ex Parte DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API