Legal Opinion
Pope v. Howle
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 22, 1933No. 7 Div. 162, 163PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The two suits or contests of municipal elec-, tions were submitted together. They were tried by the judge of the circuit without a jury, and the judgments were for contestants in each case.
The issues of controverted fact are in each case as to the exclusion or rejection of twenty-one ballots cast for contestants.
In the respective eases the contestants, Howie and Cooper, received and had counted 117 votes, exclusive of the twenty-one rejected votes cast; had the same been counted, their votes would have been 138. The eontes tees, Pope and Allen, received 12G and 120 votes…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- The People v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Gilleland v. SchuylerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Behrensmeyer v. KreitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Black v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Shepherd v. SartainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Partido Popular Democrático v. Barreto PérezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1981
- Eubanks v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Mitchell v. KinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Williams v. LideSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Cosby v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.